Page 113 - Mešinovič, Sanela, Mara Cotič, Amalija Žakelj. 2019. Učenje in poučevanje geometrije v osnovni šoli. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem.
P. 113
Literatura
Egsgard, J. C. 1970. »Some Ideas in Geometry That Can Be Taught from K-6.« Educati-
onal Studies in Mathematics 2 (4): 478–495.
Fennema, E. H. 1972. »The Relative Effectiveness of a Symbolic and a Concrete Model
in Learning a Selected Mathematical Principle.« Journal for Research in Mathe-
matics Education 3 (4): 233–238.
Fennema, E., in J. Sherman. 1977. »Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achieve-
ment, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors.« American Educational Rese-
arch Journal 14 (1): 51–71.
Friedman, M. 1978. »The Manipulative Materials Strategy: The Latest Pied Piper?« Jo-
urnal for Research in Mathematics Education 9 (1): 78–80.
Frobisher, L. 1994. »Problems, Investigations and an Investigative Approach.« V Issues
in Teaching Mathematics, ur. A. Orton in G. Wain, 150–173. London: Cassell.
———. 1996. »Changing a mathematics Problem into an Investigation.« V Prispevki k
poučevanju matematike, ur. S. Kmetič, 239–244. Maribor: Rotis.
Fuson, K., in C. Murray. 1978. »The Haptic-Visual Perception, Construction, and Drawing
of Geometric Shapes by Children Aged Two to Five: A Piagetian Extension.« V Re-
cent Research Concerning the Development of Spatial and Geometric Concepts, ur.
R. Lesh in D. Mierkiewicz, 49–84. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED159062.pdf
Forman, E., N. Minick in C. Addison. 1993. Contexts for Learning, Sociocultural Dynamics
in Children’ s Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fuys, D., D. Geddes in R. Tischler. 1988. »The Van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry
among Adolescents.« Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 3:1–196.
Gagne, R. M. 1985. The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Gardner, H. 1995. Razsežnosti uma: teorija o več inteligencah. Ljubljana: Tangram.
Geeslin, W. E. in A. O. Shar. 1979. »An Alternative Model Describing Children’s Spatial
Preferences.« Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10 (1): 57–68.
Gellert, U. 2004. »Didactic Material Confronted with the Concept of Mathematical Li-
teracy.« Educational Studies in Mathematics 55 (1): 163–179.
Glaymann, M., in T. Varga. 1979. La probabilità nella scuola dell’obligo. Roma: Armando.
Glenberg, A. M., T. Gutierrez, J. R. Levin, S. Japuntich in M. P. Kaschak. 2004. »Acti-
vity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehen-
sion.« Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 424–436.
Goldsby, D. 2009. »Research Summary: Manipulatives in Middle Grades Mathema-
tics.« http://www.amle.org/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/ArticleID/325/Research
-Summary-Manipulatives-in-Middle-Grades-Mathematics.aspx
Greeno, J. G. 1979. »Some Examples of Cognitive Task Analysis with Instructional Im-
plications.« http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html
&identifier=ADA073189
———. 1982. »A Cognitive Learning Analysis of Algebra.« Predstavljeno na letni kon-
ferenci American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, 19.–23. marec.
111
Egsgard, J. C. 1970. »Some Ideas in Geometry That Can Be Taught from K-6.« Educati-
onal Studies in Mathematics 2 (4): 478–495.
Fennema, E. H. 1972. »The Relative Effectiveness of a Symbolic and a Concrete Model
in Learning a Selected Mathematical Principle.« Journal for Research in Mathe-
matics Education 3 (4): 233–238.
Fennema, E., in J. Sherman. 1977. »Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achieve-
ment, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors.« American Educational Rese-
arch Journal 14 (1): 51–71.
Friedman, M. 1978. »The Manipulative Materials Strategy: The Latest Pied Piper?« Jo-
urnal for Research in Mathematics Education 9 (1): 78–80.
Frobisher, L. 1994. »Problems, Investigations and an Investigative Approach.« V Issues
in Teaching Mathematics, ur. A. Orton in G. Wain, 150–173. London: Cassell.
———. 1996. »Changing a mathematics Problem into an Investigation.« V Prispevki k
poučevanju matematike, ur. S. Kmetič, 239–244. Maribor: Rotis.
Fuson, K., in C. Murray. 1978. »The Haptic-Visual Perception, Construction, and Drawing
of Geometric Shapes by Children Aged Two to Five: A Piagetian Extension.« V Re-
cent Research Concerning the Development of Spatial and Geometric Concepts, ur.
R. Lesh in D. Mierkiewicz, 49–84. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED159062.pdf
Forman, E., N. Minick in C. Addison. 1993. Contexts for Learning, Sociocultural Dynamics
in Children’ s Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fuys, D., D. Geddes in R. Tischler. 1988. »The Van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry
among Adolescents.« Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 3:1–196.
Gagne, R. M. 1985. The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Gardner, H. 1995. Razsežnosti uma: teorija o več inteligencah. Ljubljana: Tangram.
Geeslin, W. E. in A. O. Shar. 1979. »An Alternative Model Describing Children’s Spatial
Preferences.« Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10 (1): 57–68.
Gellert, U. 2004. »Didactic Material Confronted with the Concept of Mathematical Li-
teracy.« Educational Studies in Mathematics 55 (1): 163–179.
Glaymann, M., in T. Varga. 1979. La probabilità nella scuola dell’obligo. Roma: Armando.
Glenberg, A. M., T. Gutierrez, J. R. Levin, S. Japuntich in M. P. Kaschak. 2004. »Acti-
vity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehen-
sion.« Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 424–436.
Goldsby, D. 2009. »Research Summary: Manipulatives in Middle Grades Mathema-
tics.« http://www.amle.org/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/ArticleID/325/Research
-Summary-Manipulatives-in-Middle-Grades-Mathematics.aspx
Greeno, J. G. 1979. »Some Examples of Cognitive Task Analysis with Instructional Im-
plications.« http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html
&identifier=ADA073189
———. 1982. »A Cognitive Learning Analysis of Algebra.« Predstavljeno na letni kon-
ferenci American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, 19.–23. marec.
111
