Page 441 - Vseživljenjsko učenje kot temelj trajnostne družbe
P. 441

Razumevanje fizikalnih vsebin s strani bodočih učiteljev razrednega pouka


               Ugotovitve raziskave kažejo, da bodoči učitelji razrednega pouka prepo-
             znavajo pomen trajnostnega razvoja v izobraževanju, vendar menijo, da jim
             primanjkuje ustreznega znanja in samozavesti pri poučevanju ključnih fizi-
             kalnih konceptov. Študijski programi bi zato morali več pozornosti nameniti
             poglabljanju fizikalnega znanja in razvijanju pedagoških kompetenc za po-
             učevanje trajnostnih vsebin. S tem bi prispevali h kakovostnejšemu pouku
             naravoslovja ter k oblikovanju učiteljev, usposobljenih za vzgojo aktivnih in
             odgovornih posameznikov.

                  Literatura
                  Baumert, J., in Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional
                     competence. V M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss in
                     M. Neubrand (ur.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and
                     professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (str.
                     25–48). Springer.
                  Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., in Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the
                     implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustain-
                     able development. Sustainability, 5(12), 5067–5080.
                  Campbell, C., in Howitt, C. (2024). Sciencein early childhood. Cambridge Univer-
                     sity Press.
                  Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., in Petrella, J. (2004). Effective reading comprehen-
                     sion instruction: Examining child instruction interactions. Journal of Edu-
                     cational Psychology, 96(4), 682–698.
                  Duit, R., in Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for
                     improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science
                     Education, 25(6), 671–688.
                  Eshach, H., in Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood?
                     Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336.
                  Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., in Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science
                     literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555.
                  Glažar, S. A., in Devetak, I. (2013). Pouk naravoslovja in naravoslovna pismenost.
                     Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 2(28), 53–66.
                  Great, K., in Great, L. (2020). Sustainability education in primary and secondary
                     schools: The role of teachers. V S. Black in L. White (ur.), Research and prac-
                     tice in sustainability education (str. 45–63). Green Education.
                  Green, M., in Somerville, M. (2015). Sustainability education: Researching prac-
                     tice in primary schools. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 832–845.
                  Jauhariyah, M. D., Riandi, R., in Suhendi, E. (2021). Enhancing students’ environ-
                     mental literacy through STEM-based learning in primary school. Journalof
                     Physics: Conference Series, 1747, 012032.
                  Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Prahani, B. K., Syahidi, K., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., in Ha-
                     riyono, E. (2021). ESD for physics: How to infuse education for sustainable


                                                                            441
   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446