Page 279 - Izobraževanje v dobi generativne umetne inteligence
P. 279

Socialno in čustveno učenje ter generativna umetna inteligenca v visokošolskem izobraževanju

             Rathod, M., Dalvi, C., Kaur, K., Patil, S., Gite, S., Kamat, P., Kotecha, K., Abraham, A., in Ga-
                 bralla, L. (2022). Kids’ emotion recognition using various deep-learning models
                 with explainable AI. Sensors, 22(20), 2–21.
             Resolucija o Nacionalnem programu visokega šolstva 2011–2020 (ReNPVŠ11-20). (2011).
                 Uradni list Republike Slovenije, (41). https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=RESO71
             Resolucija o nacionalnem programu visokega šolstva do 2030 (ReNPVŠ30). (2022).
                 Uradni list Republike Slovenije, (49). https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=RESO139
             Rutar Ilc., Z. Rogič Ožek, S., in Gramc, J. (2017). Socialno in čustveno opismenjevanje za
                 dobro vključenost (4. zv.). Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
             Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartenck, C., in Janse, M. D. (2010). Expressive robotos in
                 education: Varying the degree fo social supportive behavior of robotic tutor. V
                 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (str.
                 1613–1622). Association for Computing Machinery.
             Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V., in Cabrera, M. (2022). Evropski okvir za osebno in social-
                 no ključno kompetenco ter kompetenco učenje učenja (B. Ažman, prev.). Zavod
                 Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
             Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., in Gerli, A. G. (2023) Can artificial intelligence help for
                 scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75.
             Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of
                 Children, 27(1),137–155.
             Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., in Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and
                 attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging
                 trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115(2), 106552.
             Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and
                 ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–167.
             Shourmasti, E., Palacios, R., Holone, H., in Demi, S. (2021). User experience in social
                 robots. Sensors, 21(15), 5052.
             Štuikys, V. (2015). Smart learning objects for smart education in computer science: Theory,
                 methodology and robot-based implementation. Springer.
             Thomas, C., in Kelo, M. (2020). ESG 2015-2018 ENQUA agency reports: Thematic analysis
                 (ENQA Occasional Paper 28). European Association for Quality Assurance in
                 Higher Education.
             Van Camp, J. (2017). Review: Jibo social robot. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2017/11
                 /review-jibo-social-robot/
             Vrhovski Mohorič, M., Javornik, K., Željko, I., in Smolič, U. (2016). Ali in kako lahko profe-
                 sorji, asistenti in študenti aktivno soustvarjamo učni (pedagoški) in raziskovalni
                 proces? V K. Aškerc, S. Cvetek, V. Florjančič, M. Klemenčič, B. Marentič Požarnik
                 in S. Rutar. (ur.), Izboljševanje kakovosti poučevanja in učenja v visokošolskem
                 izobraževanju: od teorije k praksi, od prakse k teoriji (str. 71–79). Center Republike
                 Slovenije za mobilnost in evropske programe izobraževanja in usposabljanja.





                                                                           279
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284