Page 203 - Izobraževanje v dobi generativne umetne inteligence
P. 203

Raba umetne inteligence pri učenju in poučevanju v obveznem izobraževanju

             Evropska komisija. (2020a). Akcijski načrt za digitalno izobraževanje (2021–2027). https://
                 education.ec.europa.eu/sl/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
             Evropska komisija. (2020b). Evropska strategija za podatke. https://commission.europa
                 .eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european
                 -data-strategy_sl
             Evropska komisija. (2022). Etične smernice za uporabo umetne inteligence in podatkov
                 pri poučevanju in učenju za izobraževalce. https://op.europa.eu/sl/publication
                 -detail/-/publication/d81a0d54-5348-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1
             Ferbežar, N., in Štemberger, T. (2023). Sistematični pregled literature v kontekstu peda-
                 goškega raziskovanja. Sodobna pedagogika, 74 = 140(1), 28–43.
             Goksel, N., in Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights
                 and future perspectives. V S. Sisman-Ugur in G. Kurubacak (ur.), Handbook of
                 research on learning in the age of transhumanism (str. 224–236). IGI Global. 
             Guan, C., Mou, J., in Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
                 Access, 8, 75264–75278. 
             Higuera, C. de la, in Iyer, J. (Ur.). (2024). AI for teachers: An open textbook (2. izd.). UNES-
                 CO.
             Hwang, G.-J., in Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence
                 in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic
                 review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. 
             Kok, J. N., Boers, E. J. W., Kosters, W. A., van der Putten, P., in Poel, M. (2002). Artificial
                 intelligence: Definition, trends, techniques, and cases. V Knowledge for sustain-
                 able development: An insight into the Encyclopedia of life support systems (str.
                 1095–1107). UNESCO.
             Kuleto, V., Ilić, M. P., Bucea-Manea-Țoniş, R., Ciocodeică, D. F., Mihălcescu, H., in Min-
                 drescu, V. (2022). The attitudes of K-12 schools’ teachers in Serbia towards the
                 potential of artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 14(14), 8636–8648.
             Luan, H., in Tsai, C.-C. (2021). A review of using machine learning approaches for preci-
                 sion education. Educational Technology and Society, 24(1), 250–266.
             Lucas, M., Zhang, Y., Bem-haja, P., in Vicente, P. N. (2024). The interplay between
                 teachers’ trust in artificial intelligence and digital competence. Education and
                 Information Technologies, 29, 22991–23010.
             Mažgon, J. (2008). Razvoj akcijskega raziskovanja na temeljnih postavkah kvalitativne
                 metodologije. Znanstvenoraziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.
             Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). Education infor-
                 matisation 2.0 action plan [V kitajščini]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/
                 s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html
             National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020, H.R. 6216, 116th Cong. (2020).
                 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6216
             National Science and Technology Council. (2016). Preparing for the future of artificial
                 intelligence.



                                                                           203
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208