Page 96 - Sustaining Accommodation SMES
P. 96

6Analysis

                dimensions. The adoption of organisational and strategic practices re-
                flects not only environmental intent but also internal coordination, re-
                sponsibility sharing, and engagement with external stakeholders. The ob-
                served cross-country variation indicates that while environmental con-
                cerns are broadly recognised across the Mediterranean, the capacity to
                translate these concerns into socially embedded and organisationally
                structured forms of environmentally significant behaviour differs sub-
                stantially between contexts.
                  Overall, Table 6.21 demonstrates that the sustainability status quo
                across the Mediterranean accommodation sector is characterised by con-
                vergence in basic environmentally significant behaviours and divergence
                in more complex forms of sustainability adoption. Greece demonstrates
                a more advanced integration of sustainability across environmental and
                organisational dimensions, Spain reflects an intermediate stage, while
                Italy and Slovenia exhibit sustainability profiles centred primarily on op-
                erational environmental practices. These patterns underscore that cross
                Mediterranean differences in sustainability adoption are shaped less by
                the presence of environmental awareness and more by country specific
                institutional, organisational, and contextual conditions that enable or
                constrain more demanding forms of environmentally significant be-
                haviour.

                iso 21401 readiness level
                Table 6.22 presents the level of alignment of Slovenian accommodation
                providers with the requirements of the iso 21401 standard. Alignment is
                interpreted as the extent to which practices and organisational arrange-
                ments corresponding to iso 21401 requirements are already in place, re-
                gardless of whether formal certification has been pursued.
                  The results indicate that alignment is strongest for requirements re-
                lated to basic environmental management and operational control. A
                substantial share of respondents’ report alignment with requirements
                concerning waste management, resource efficiency, and the mitigation
                of environmental impacts associated with daily operations. These areas
                reflect iso 21401 requirements that build upon practices commonly inte-
                grated into routine accommodation management and are therefore more
                likely to be met.
                  In contrast, lower levels of alignment are observed for requirements
                that depend on formalised management systems and structured organ-
                isational processes. These include requirements related to documented


                       96
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101