Page 95 - Sustaining Accommodation SMES

6.2 Quantitative Insights

Slovenia, Italy, Spain, and Greece, assessed through Chi-square tests of in-
dependence. Interpreted through the Triple Bottom Line perspective and
Stern’s theory of environmentally significant behaviour, the results reveal
both shared adoption patterns and clearly differentiated country specific
sustainability profiles. Across all four countries, adoption is most consis-
tent for practices associated with basic environmental management at the
operational level. Practices such as waste handling infrastructure show
no statistically significant differences between Slovenia, Italy, Spain, and
Greece, indicating a shared baseline of environmentally oriented opera-
tional behaviour across the Mediterranean accommodation sector. These
practices correspond to forms of environmentally significant behaviour
that are strongly shaped by contextual factors such as infrastructure avail-
ability, regulatory requirements, and routine operational norms.
In contrast, statistically significant cross-country differences emerge
for practices that require higher levels of organisational structuring and
strategic commitment. Greece stands out as a context in which prac-
tices such as sustainability strategies or action plans, dedicated sustain-
ability teams or coordinators, and environmental labels or certificates
are adopted by a comparatively large share of accommodation providers.
This suggests that environmentally significant behaviour in Greece more
frequently extends beyond operational actions and is embedded in for-
mal organisational arrangements.
Spain occupies an intermediate position. While basic environmental
practices are widely adopted, the adoption of more formalised practices
related to planning, certification, and structured responsibility alloca-
tion is less consistent than in Greece. This pattern indicates that envi-
ronmentally significant behaviour in Spain is partially institutionalised,
combining operational environmental actions with emerging but un-
even organisational integration. Italy and Slovenia display more selective
adoption patterns. In both contexts, operational environmental prac-
tices are commonly adopted, but practices that require formal planning,
dedicated sustainability roles, or external certification show significantly
lower adoption rates. From the perspective of environmentally significant
behaviour, this suggests that sustainability actions in Italy and Slovenia
are more often driven by routine operational considerations and contex-
tual constraints, rather than by sustained organisational commitment or
formalised sustainability governance.
Within the Triple Bottom Line framework, these country differences
are particularly visible for practices that span environmental and social

95