Page 68 - Sustaining Accommodation SMES
P. 68

6Analysis

                flows. Retrofitting such buildings to meet iso 21401 environmental re-
                quirements incurs substantially higher capital expenditure than design-
                ing new sustainability into greenfield properties – a contextual constraint
                particularly acute for smes with limited access to capital.
                  Furthermore, the survey revealed that 46.0 of respondents oper-
                ate under a logic of specialised labour, with clear departmental divi-
                sions. Whilst operationally efficient, this structure can hinder the cross-
                functional integration required by holistic Sustainability Management
                Systems. Energy reduction, waste minimisation, and water stewardship
                require coordinated action across housekeeping, kitchen, maintenance,
                and front-of-house operations. In specialised structures, such integra-
                tion requires explicit coordination mechanisms and formal communica-
                tion protocols-administrative overhead that Stern’s (2000) framework
                identifies as a Contextual Barrier. Conversely, 54.0 operate under a
                logic of flexible multitasking, where individual staff members perform
                multiple functions. This structure enables rapid decision-making and
                adaptation but diffuses responsibility for sustainability objectives across
                numerous role boundaries, making systematic implementation more
                challenging.
                  The sample’s environmental positioning is shaped by geography: 52.1
                (n = 110) are located in predominantly coastal areas, placing them on the
                frontline of climate change impacts-rising sea levels, increased storm in-
                tensity, water scarcity exacerbated by tourism demand, and ecosystem
                degradation. These properties face both existential risk and operational
                vulnerability, creating both urgency and practical pressure for climate
                adaptation (Saarinen et al., 2021).
                  Regarding formal sustainability engagement, 57.3 of respondents re-
                ported holding some form of environmental label or certification (Green
                Key, Travelife, Green Globe, eu Ecolabel, or national certifications), and
                62.6 indicated having a formal sustainability strategy or action plan.
                Thesefigures suggest theawareness phasehas been largely achieved: the
                sector is not ignorant of sustainability imperatives. Rather, the sector
                is in the difficult phase of operationalising commitments into the rig-
                orous, documented systems required by iso 21401 (International Or-
                ganization for Standardization, 2024). This observation aligns with the
                ‘attitude-behaviour gap’ extensively documented in environmental psy-
                chology, demonstrating that awareness and stated intentions do not au-
                tomatically translate into systematic, documented, continuously improv-
                ing practice (Juvan & Dolnicar, 2016). The presence of environmental


                       68
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73