Page 69 - Sustaining Accommodation SMES
P. 69

6.2 Quantitative Insights

            Table 6.9 Sustainability Orientation and Success Rate
            Item         Country               Very low –()  Very high – ()
            Importance   Bosnia and Herzegovina          .           .
            of sustainabil-  Slovenia                    .           .
            ity as a guiding
                         Greece                          .           .
            principle
                         Italy                           .           .
                         Spain                           .           .
            Success in   Bosnia and Herzegovina          .           .
            practicing sus-  Slovenia                    .           .
            tainability as a
                         Greece                          .           .
            guiding princi-
                         Italy                           .           .
            ple
                         Spain                           .           .
            Notes Importance of sustainability as a guiding principle: 0 – not important at all, 9 –
            extremely important. Perceived success in practicing sustainability as a guiding principle:
            0 – not successfull at all, 9 – extremely successful.


            labels and sustainability plans indicates that proprietors recognise the
            importance of sustainability and have invested in articulating commit-
            ments. The remaining challenge is not attitudinal but structural: translat-
            ing these articulated aspirations into formalised, auditable management
            systems.
              Table 6.9 presents country-level patterns in sustainability orientation
            and perceived success in implementation. Across all five countries, sus-
            tainability is widely recognised as an important guiding principle for ac-
            commodation businesses. High ratings of importance (7–9) clearly dom-
            inate, particularly in Slovenia and Greece, where sustainability appears
            close to being normalised as a core business value. Very low importance
            ratings (0–2) remain marginal in all contexts, indicating limited outright
            resistance to sustainability as a strategic orientation.
              However, when shifting from orientation to practice, a consistent gap
            becomes visible. While a substantial share of respondents still rate their
            sustainability practices as highly successful, the proportion of high scores
            is systematically lower than for perceived importance. This pattern sug-
            gests that sustainability is more firmly established at the level of values
            and intentions than at the level of operational execution. The gap is most
            pronounced in Spain and Bosnia and Herzegovina, where high impor-
            tance ratings are not matched by equally strong perceptions of success-
                                           2
            ful implementation. Chi-square (χ ) tests were conducted to examine
            cross-country differences in sustainability orientation and perceived im-


                                                                 69
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74