Page 294 - International Perspectives on Effective Teaching and Learning in Digital Education

Igor Karnjuš, Mirko Prosen, and Sabina Ličen

Identi cation of studies via databases

Records identi ed from Records removed before
Identi cation • PubMed (n = 50) Duplicate records removed

databases (n = 138):
screening:

• Web of Science (n = 88)
(n = 31)

Records screened – title and Records excluded based

abstract (n = 107) on title and abstract (n = 55)

Reports sought for retrieval Reports not retrived:

(n = 52) No full text available (n = 13)
Screening

Reports assesed for eligibility
(n = 39) Reports excluded:
• Not focused on non-technical
skills (n = 17)
• Not relevant to research
objectives (n = 12)

Studies included in review
Included (n = 10)

Figure 1 The Literature Search and Study Selection Process, Presented With PRISMA
Statement Flow Diagram (Moher et al., 9)

Review Results
Figure 1 shows the literature search process according to the PRISMA meth-
odology (Moher et al., 9). We identified 168 hits in CINAHL, 137 hits in Pu-
bMed and 41 hits in Science Direct. All hits were imported into Zotero for
easy organization, citation and referencing. After removing 93 duplicates,
we screened 413 hits based on title and abstract, of which 373 were removed
for thematic inappropriateness. In the next step, we screened 4 articles in
full-text and retained 1 of them, after which we additionally excluded 4 arti-
cles on the basis of inadequate quality. Finally, 17 articles were included in the
detailed literature analysis, as shown in Figure 1.

94