Page 220 - Izobraževanje v dobi generativne umetne inteligence
P. 220
Marina Volk in Sanela Hudovernik
paristodemou (ur.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contempo-
rary mathematics education (str. 193–213). IGI Global.
Baker, D., Knipe, H., Collins, J., Leon, J., Cummings, E., Blair, C., in Gamson, D. (2010).
One hundred years of elementary school mathematics in the United States:
A content analysis and cognitive assessment of textbooks from 1900 to 2000.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 383–423.
Battista, M. T., in Clements, D. H. (1986). The effects of Logo and CAI problem-solv-
ing environments on problem-solving abilities and mathematics achieve-
ment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(3), 183–193.
Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understand-
ings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41–62.
Boaler, J. (2000). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex.
Brandão, A., Pedro, L., in Zagalo, N. (2024). Teacher professional development for a
future with generative artificial intelligence: An integrative literature review.
Digital Education Review, 45, 151–157.
Brown, E. T., Karp, K., Petrosko, J. M., Jones, J., Beswick, G., Howe, C., in Zwanzig, K.
(2007). Crutch or catalyst: Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding calculator
use in mathematics instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 107(3), 102–116.
Buldt, B., in Schlimm, D. (2010). Loss of vision: How mathematics turned blind while
it learned to see more clearly. V B. Löwe in T. Müller (ur.), PhiMSAMP: Philosophy
of mathematics; Aspects and mathematical practice (str. 39–58). College Publica-
tions.
Burns, B., in Coon, H. (1990). Logo programming and peer interactions: An analysis of
process- and product-oriented collaborations. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 6(4), 393–410.
Caudill, L., Hill, A., Hoke, K., in Lipan, O. (2010). Impact of interdisciplinary undergradu-
ate research in mathematics and biology on the development of a new course
integrating five STEM disciplines. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 212–216.
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., in Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges
of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends,
66(4), 616–630.
Chan, C. K. Y., in Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits,
and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technol-
ogy in Higher Education, 20(1), 43–18.
Chen, L., Chen, P., in Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
Access, 8, 75264–75278.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and
research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive
Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203.
Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., in Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology.
ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(3), 1223–1242.
220