Page 220 - Izobraževanje v dobi generativne umetne inteligence
P. 220

Marina Volk in Sanela Hudovernik

                      paristodemou (ur.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contempo-
                      rary mathematics education (str. 193–213). IGI Global.
                  Baker, D., Knipe, H., Collins, J., Leon, J., Cummings, E., Blair, C., in Gamson, D. (2010).
                      One hundred years of elementary school mathematics in the United States:
                      A content analysis and cognitive assessment of textbooks from 1900 to 2000.
                      Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 383–423.
                  Battista, M. T., in Clements, D. H. (1986). The effects of Logo and CAI problem-solv-
                      ing environments on problem-solving abilities and mathematics achieve-
                      ment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(3), 183–193.
                  Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understand-
                      ings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41–62.
                  Boaler, J. (2000). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex.
                  Brandão, A., Pedro, L., in Zagalo, N. (2024). Teacher professional development for a
                      future with generative artificial intelligence: An integrative literature review.
                      Digital Education Review, 45, 151–157.
                  Brown, E. T., Karp, K., Petrosko, J. M., Jones, J., Beswick, G., Howe, C., in Zwanzig, K.
                      (2007). Crutch or catalyst: Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding calculator
                      use in mathematics instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 107(3), 102–116.
                  Buldt, B., in Schlimm, D. (2010). Loss of vision: How mathematics turned blind while
                      it learned to see more clearly. V B. Löwe in T. Müller (ur.), PhiMSAMP: Philosophy
                      of mathematics; Aspects and mathematical practice (str. 39–58). College Publica-
                      tions.
                  Burns, B., in Coon, H. (1990). Logo programming and peer interactions: An analysis of
                      process- and product-oriented collaborations. Journal of Educational Computing
                      Research, 6(4), 393–410. 
                  Caudill, L., Hill, A., Hoke, K., in Lipan, O. (2010). Impact of interdisciplinary undergradu-
                      ate research in mathematics and biology on the development of a new course
                      integrating five STEM disciplines. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 212–216.
                  Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., in Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges
                      of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends,
                      66(4), 616–630.
                  Chan, C. K. Y., in Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits,
                      and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technol-
                      ogy in Higher Education, 20(1), 43–18.
                  Chen, L., Chen, P., in Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
                      Access, 8, 75264–75278.
                  Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and
                      research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive
                      Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203.
                  Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., in Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology.
                      ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(3), 1223–1242.



                  220
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225