Page 123 - Safe Wrestling
P. 123

Overview of Injury-Prevention Warm-Up Programmes

            Table 8.1 Continued from the previous page
             Item     Wrestling Plus  IPPON      IPW          MASS-12
             Structure  14 exercis-  36 exercis-  20 min; RAMP - 12 exercises;
             and      es; ∼20 min;  es; ∼10 min;  Raise (9 exercis- ∼15–20 min;
             duration  3blocks: warm- 3blocks (mo-  es), Activate (6  emphasis on
                      up (8 min), sta-  bility/agility;  exercises), Mo-  agility, plyomet-
                      bilisation and  balance/co-  bilise (4 exercis- rics, trunk sta-
                      strengthening  ordination;  es), Potentiate  bilisation and
                      (9 min), sport-  strength/stabil- (5 exercises),  balance
                      specific exer-  ity); each cat-  Partner drills
                      cises (3 min);  egory has 12  (5 exercises);
                      at least twice  exercises and  twice per week
                      per week      3 difficulty lev-
                                    els; warm-up
                                    usually con-
                                    sists of 4 exer-
                                    cises from each
                                    category; twice
                                    per week
             Partner/  Partner used  Individual and  Individual and  Mostly individ-
             equipment for resistance  partner exer-  partner exer-  ual, no equip-
                      and interaction  cises (partner  cises, no equip- ment
                      (e.g. falls, lifts);  used for resis-  ment
                      equipment (fit-  tance and in-
                      ball, BOSU ball) teraction); no
                                    equipment
             Evidence  Yes; ran-    Randomised   Proposal based  Programme
             of effec-  domised and  controlled tri-  on review of ev- with strong the-
             tiveness  experimental  als: no statisti-  idence; inter-  oretical and
                      studies       cally significant vention studies  biomechanical
                                    reduction in in- required  rationale, but
                                    jury prevalence;          limited direct
                                    good feasibility          evidence of in-
                                    and adherence             jury reduction
            Notes IPPON – Injury Prevention and Performance Optimization Netherlands; IPW
            – Injury-Prevention Warm-up; RAMP – Raise-Activate-Mobilise-Potentiate.

            nificant empirical evidence, whereas others should be regarded primar-
            ily as evidence-informed proposals with sound theoretical and biome-
            chanical rationale but limited direct intervention evidence demonstrat-
            ing injury reduction. Furthermore, implementation-related factors such
            as feasibility, clarity of structure, coach-led delivery, and long-term ad-
            herence appear to be decisive determinants of real-world effectiveness,

                                                         123
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128