Page 170 - Vseživljenjsko učenje kot temelj trajnostne družbe
P. 170

Maja Lebeničnik and Karmen Drljić


            Table 3 Correlations between Mindset and Different Components of Ableism
             (Sub)scale                       Mindset     Fixed mindset  Growth mindset
                                               ρ      p      ρ      p      ρ      p
             Personal responsibility         .‡  .  –.   .   .‡ <.
             Discrimination                  –.‡  .  .‡  .‡  –.  .
             Low empathy                     –.  .   .   .  –.   .
             Inspirational portrayal of disability  .  .  –.  .  .  .
             Symbolic ableism                –.  .   .   .   .   .
            Notes  ‡Significant correlation coefficients.

                  discrimination subscale, but not on the inspirational portrayal of disability
                  subscale. Students from Group 1, who are expected to work with vulnera-
                  ble groups, report ableism to a lesser degree than students who will work
                  mainly with the mainstream population. They report fewer discriminatory
                  beliefs, higher empathy towards people with disabilities and assign less per-
                  sonal responsibility for success to people with disabilities. Those results were
                  expected, because students from Pedagogy/Social Pedagogy/Inclusive Ped-
                  agogyprogrammesprobablyhavemoreexperienceandcontactwithpeople
                  with disabilities, and contact can lower the degree of prejudice against the
                  group (Rizzo et al., 2021). Differences in age or knowledge between groups
                  can also cause differences in ableism and so we will address this later with
                  linear regression analysis.

                  Mindset and Ableism
                  Mindset has recently been proposed as a potential factor contributing to
                  stigma and prejudices (Hoyt & Burnette, 2025). The nature and direction of
                  this relationship is not clear yet. In Hypothesis 2 we suggested that mindset
                  and ableism are significantly correlated, but the direction of the correlation
                  was not assumed. In Table 3 we can see the correlation coefficient between
                  mindset(measuredasaunidimensionalandtwo-dimensionalconstruct)and
                  different components of ableism.
                    As seen in Table 3, two subscales from A-SAS showed statistically signifi-
                  cant correlations with mindset. Correlations between the personal respon-
                  sibility, discrimination and mindset scales (when measured as unidimen-
                  sional construct) are weak (–0.16 < ρ < 0.16). When measuring mindset as a
                  two-dimensional construct, a correlation between growth mindset and per-
                  sonal responsibility becomes moderate (ρ = 0.42). Fixed mindset is positively
                  related to the discrimination subscale, but correlation is weak. Results on
                  other A-SAS subscales as well as the scale’s total score (labelled Symbolic


                  170
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175