Page 233 - International Perspectives on Effective Teaching and Learning in Digital Education
P. 233

Culturally Sensitive and Congruent Digital Learning Initiative

             and especially since the Covid-19 pandemic appeared in our lives. First intro-
             duced in  by Seth Frank, digital health largely encompassed internet-fo-
             cused applications and media to improve medical content, commerce, and
             connectivity (Frank, ). The term digital health has expanded to encom-
             pass a much broader set of scientific concepts and technologies, including
             genomics, artificial intelligence, analytics, wearables, mobile applications,
             and telemedicine (Boodoo et al, 17) all of them used not only with patients
             but also in the training process of health professionals, either in classrooms,
             during simulation or in practice. In addition, digital health technologies are
             being applied much more broadly in health professions to include diagno-
             sis, treatment, clinical decision support, care management, and care deliv-
             ery. In 18, the World Health Organization issued a detailed taxonomy of
             Digital Health, articulating dozens of facets of this expanding space (World
             Health Orgaanization, 18). The classification of digital health interventions
             (DHIs) categorizes the different ways in which digital and mobile technolo-
             gies are being used to support health system needs. Historically, the diverse
             communities working in digital health – including government stakehold-
             ers, technologists, clinicians, implementers, network operators, researchers,
             academics, donors – have lacked a mutually understandable language with
             which to assess and articulate functionality. A shared and standardized vo-
             cabulary was recognized by the World Health Orgaanization as necessary
             to identify gaps and duplication, evaluate effectiveness, and facilitate align-
             ment across different digital health implementations. Targeted primarily at
             public health audiences, this Classification framework aimed to promote an
             accessible and bridging language for health program planners to articulate
             functionalities of digital health implementations. However, when it comes
             to education and in relation with digitalization and digital health, another
             term digital learning appears and many people use it interchangeably in the
             form of synonim terms such as distance learning, e-learning, online learning,
             and virtual learning. E-learning, online learning, and virtual learning all fall into
             the umbrella concept of technology-enhanced learning. However, they mean
             different things, and all focus on a different aspect of education. In order to
             distinguish them, it’s useful to think about where and how the learning pro-
             cess happens. The location can be onsite or remote, the communication can
             be synchronous or asynchronous, the delivery can be online or offline, and
             the device can be digital or analogue. Here is an overview of how distance
             learning, e-learning, online learning, and virtual learning differ in terms of lo-
             cation, communication, delivery mode, and device according to the major
             assumptions of World Health Orgaanization (18):


                                                                            33
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238