Page 64 - World Heritage and Tourism Innovation
P. 64

Raffaela Gabriella Rizzo                             An intangible cultural heritage asset




               for their activity, to begin the phase of so-called “ca-  (musicologists and ethnomusicologists); violin mak-
               pacity building”. These sessions represent, in fact, the   ers (in particular the dozen or so out of 150 who are
               basis for the subsequent creation of measures that   prepared to give guided tours of their workshops); di-
               will be inserted in the planning for managing the vi-  rectors of the Cremona Fair; tourist guides; specialist
               olin-making heritage as a “heritage that is living and   publishers in the musical/violin making field; and mu-
               therefore – of necessity – ever-changing” and also   sicians/orchestra members. The question was asked to
               “an expertise rooted in the local context, which has   these territorial actors rather than tourists because of
               at the same time a global scope” (Ana Luiza Massot   the characteristics of the historical period in which
               Thompson-Flores, director of the UNESCO Regional   the study was conducted. A common denominator
               Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe, in Museo   in all the interviews was the assertion that there is no
               del Violino, 2021). From the voices of the luthiers, also   awareness of the tourists regarding the ‘UNESCO im-
               confirmed by the questionnaire given to them volun-  material element of violin-making savoir-faire’ when
               tarily, it emerges that they sense the need to promote   they visit the city of Cremona and its iconic locations
               their professionalism/activity combined with that of   (e.g., the Violin Museum, violin makers’ workshops,
               UNESCO in an action that is synergic and shared with   Ponchielli Theatre, etc.). Three declarations appear to
               the various institutions of Cremona.         be symbolic and worthy of being quoted: 
                                                                  “Tourists do not know about our  UNESCO
               Awareness About the UNESCO ICH Element             membership” (all the stakeholders inter-
               for Tourists and Day Visitors                      viewed);
               The second question in this research regards the tour-
               ists and day visitors’ awareness of the ICH element un-  “The average tourist does not know the intan-
               der investigation. Of interest – and before the study   gible heritage value of Cremona, and the luth-
               conducted by the author – is the survey carried out   iers’ workshops are not perceived as tourist
               by Cremona’s municipal Infopoint office in 2021 on a   places” (tourist guide);
               sample of 4,000 tourists, from which it emerges that   “Cremona  has  always  been  perceived  as  the
               “69% of the tourists interviewed declared that the   city of violin music; UNESCO came later, and it
               principal motive for their visit to Cremona was “art,   is not in the tourist’s mind” (words of the luthi-
               culture  and  related  events”,  followed  by  “food  and   er who carries out the most significant number
               wine and related events” (28%)” (Province of Crem-  of guided tours).
               ona-Office of Statistics, 2021, p. 40). Such a decision
               on the part of the tourist suggests that Cremona is a   Conclusive Remarks
               destination for cultural tourism tout court and, within   To understand the role and the attractive/competitive/
               this, for music-based tourism. The promotional choic-  complementary importance of a small city like Crem-
               es made by the institutional subject, the Municipality   ona, one must remember that the urban cultural tour-
               of Cremona, bear witness to the result of this survey.   ism available in Italia is highly subdivided. Apart from
                  Taking her cue from this consideration, the author   the “classic”, overly-frequented tourist destinations
               sought to comprehend the relationship between the   of Florence, Venice and Rome, even if one considers
               tourist and the ICH of Cremona’s violin, making sa-  only Northern Italy (Turri, 2000) – apart from the me-
               voir-faire. She, therefore, asked the question, “Is the   tropolises of Milan and Turin – many small and me-
               tourist and day visitor who goes to Cremona aware   dium-sized cities contain inestimable cultural heritag-
               that they are visiting one of UNESCO’s immaterial el-  es: the Italy of the “intermediary cities” of Giuseppe
               ements?” in open interviews with some twenty stake-  De Rita (2022). These are now all “open” for musical
               holders: officials of the UNESCO Office in the Munici-  entertainment. From the numerous medium-sized
               pality of Cremona and those responsible for the city’s   towns, one passes to the minor centres (Touring Club
               promotion/tourist  information;  university  lecturers   Italiano, 1983) and then to the so-called Borghi, where



               60 | Proceedings of the 7th UNESCO UNITWIN Conference
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69