Page 124 - How to Shine on Stage
P. 124

An important factor that often contributes to MPA is perfectionism.
                     Patston and Margaret S. Osborne (2016) have examined the predictive
                     role of perfectionism in MPA from a developmental perspective. They
                     found that correlations between perfectionism and age consistently ex-
                     hibit a strong, positive, highly significant link to MPA between the ages
                     of 10 to 17, particularly in terms of concern about making mistakes. They
                     also found that this link increases with years of experience. Bianka Do-
                     bos et al. (2019) found that four out of six subscales of perfectionism sig-
        122          nificantly predicted MPA, among which parental criticism and doubts
                     about actions were positive, while parental expectations and preference
                     for organization were negative predictors. Similarly, Sintija Leva Buk-
                     ovnik (2018) confirmed the existence of a significant connection between
           How to Shine on Stage  tive connection between MPA and personal standards, and a moder-
                     MPA and perfectionism among Slovenian musicians; namely, a nega-
                     ately positive connection between MPA and doubts about  performance,
                     expectations, and parental criticism.
                         With regard to gender, most studies confirm higher levels of MPA
                     in women at all developmental stages (Brugués, 2011; Habe, 1998; 2002;
                     Habe & Kržič, 2017; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2012; Kenny, 2008; Yondem,
                     2007). However, it should be noted that studies using physiological met-
                     rics have not confirmed differences in MPA (Abel & Larkin, 1990; Ryan,
                     2004).
                         In contrast to individual factors, there are many contextual factors
                     for MPA, including the size of the audience, the nature of the  perfor-
                     mance  (competition,   audition,  concert), the type of   performance  (re-
                     hearsal, solo/group   performance), the musical genre, the instrument
                     played, and previous  performance experience. Research studies indicate
                     an increase in MPA with audience size (Broughton, 2015; Endo et al.,
                     2014; Habe, 1998; Kwan, 2016). Competitions induce higher MPA (Mi-
                     chiko et al., 2009; Papageorgi et al., 2007), while solo performances in-
                     duce higher MPA than group performances (Habe, 1998; Goren, 2014;
                     Nicholson et al., 2015). Nicholson et al. (2015) found that social anxie-
                     ty predicts MPA in both practice and  performance settings, while the
                     fear of negative evaluation predicts MPA in practice and in solo and
                     group  performance settings. Some studies have suggested that MPA var-
                     ies depending on the instrument played (Iuscă & Dafinoiu, 2012; Kemp,
                     1996; Manning, 2013). Dorina Iuscă and Dafinoiu (2012) have found
                     that string players and singers experience significantly higher MPA than
                     pianists, woodwind players, and brass players. Manning (2013) reports
                     the highest levels of MPA in woodwind players and the lowest in brass
                     players and percussionists. He also notes that different instrumentalists
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129