Page 240 - International Perspectives on Effective Teaching and Learning in Digital Education
P. 240

Manuel Lillo-Crespo

                  da Vinci covering education and training (in the period 1995–6) and the
                  Lifelong Learning programme succeeding these from 7–13. In 14 the
                  EU created a single overarching programme for Education, Training, Youth and
                  Sport. Given its resounding success over the years and the fact that Erasmus
                  was far more widely known than the other programme titles, it was decid-
                  ed to extend the Erasmus brand name to the whole of the new programme.
                  The ‘+’ is meant to recall that the programme supports more sectors than just
                  higher education as it did at its origins. In this second phase, nowadays the
                  programme is focused on four overarching priorities: (a) supporting the green
                  transition, (b) addressing the digital transformation, (c) promoting social inclu-
                  sion and diversity and (d) fostering stronger participation in democratic life,
                  common values and civic engagement. In the fields of health professions, un-
                  til now the European higher education mobility action only supported physi-
                  cal and blended mobility of higher education students in any study field and
                  cycle (short cycle, bachelor, master and doctoral levels). Students could either
                  study abroad at a partner higher education institution or carry out a trainee-
                  ship in an enterprise, a research institute, a laboratory, an organisation or any
                  other relevant workplace abroad. Students could also combine a study period
                  abroad with a traineeship, further enhancing the learning outcomes and de-
                  velopment of transversal skills. While long term physical or face-to-face mobil-
                  ity used to be strongly encouraged, nowadays and especially since Covid-19
                  pandemic this action plan recognises the need to offer more flexible physical
                  mobility duration to ensure the programme is accessible to students from all
                  backgrounds, circumstances and study fields and therefore digital learning
                  options could be the key solution. Specifically in the case of European health
                  professions’ education, digitalisation under the umbrella of the European dig-
                  ital health framework -presented until now- seems to be the path to be fol-
                  lowed.  The Mobility action has also aimed until now to foster employability,
                  social inclusion, civic engagement, innovation and environmental sustainabil-
                  ity in Europe and beyond by enabling students from all study fields and at all
                  study cycles to have the opportunity to study or train abroad as part of their
                  studies and again digitalision could guarantee this as everyday the number of
                  jobs based on technologies and digital tools are increasing without any need
                  to move from home. The objectives of the traditional mobility action – apart
                  from the main one based on the cultural approach and immersion – that could
                  be assured by including digitalisation are, among others (Pereira et al., 4):


                     1)  expose students to different views, knowledge, teaching and research
                       methods as well as work practices in their study field in the European


                  4
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245