Page 138 - International Perspectives on Effective Teaching and Learning in Digital Education
P. 138

Milena Ivanuš Grmek, Monika Mithans, and Sabina Ograjšek

                  Table 6   Students’ Self–Assessments of Their Abilities in Evaluating Digital Content and Devices
                  I can …                       N    M    SD   MIN  MAX   U     p
                  … evaluate whether an email is spam,   356  4.14  .71  .  5. 18.5 .5
                  adware, phishing, or fraud.
                  … evaluate whether some information is  356  3.91  .73  .  5. 191.5 .47
                  hoax, fake, scam, or fraud.
                  … evaluate an object and/or a smart   356  3.84  .77  .  5. 1311.5 .63
                  device using appropriate quality criteria
                  (e.g., authenticity, utility, easy to use,
                  appearance, functionality, enjoyment).
                  … critique an object and/or a smart   356  3.84  .74  .  5. 1393.5 .11
                  device on relevant social media (e.g.,
                  TripAdvisor, YouTube, Amazon).
                  … evaluate whether a website is secure   356  3.81  .74  .  5. 13637. .47
                  and trusted.
                  … identify the intellectual property   356  3.59  .83  1.  5. 1666. .6
                  rights (IPRs) of content that I have found
                  on Internet.


                  is spam, adware, phishing, or fraud, recognize intellectual property rights of
                  online content, and determine if a piece of information is fake or fraudulent.
                  However, no significant differences were found in their abilities to assess the
                  quality of a product or smart device, critically review items on social media
                  platforms, or evaluate the safety and trustworthiness of websites.

                  Protect
                  The responses provide insights into students’ self-assessed abilities in pro-
                  tecting their digital identities and devices. Students feel most confident in
                  regularly changing passwords and settings on their smart devices and in-
                  ternet accounts. The ability to protect various smart devices and e-accounts
                  using different passwords and frequently changing them also ranks highly.
                  Students show moderate confidence in their ability to protect themselves
                  and others against identity theft, harassment, bullying, or slander, which has
                  the lowest average rating among the tasks listed. While they feel capable in
                  this area, the lower rating indicates that students perceive this task as more
                  complex and challenging than managing passwords and device settings.
                    The Mann-Whitney test revealed significant differences in one ability, as
                  elementary education students ranked higher in their ability to protect them-
                  selves and others from identity theft, harassment, bullying, or defamation.
                  However, no significant differences were found between elementary and
                  preschool education students in their abilities to regularly change passwords
                  and settings on their smart devices and internet accounts, or to protect var-


                  138
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143