Page 23 - World Heritage and Tourism Innovation
P. 23

Hiyab Gebretsadik Weldearegay      Critics on Heritage Laws and Tourism Politics in Ethiopia




            of knowledge in the area; this requires a knowledge   Ethiopian  heritages and articulate them because of
            extension type of discourse that fills the rift of exhaus-  the Ethiopian tourism remuneration landscape.
            tiveness and the ideological vacuum. Second, they do
            not show how they are reflected by what applies in   Specific Objectives
            what context, especially in multi-national federations   To analyse the substantive spirit and essence of the
            like Ethiopia, historically polarised states, develop-  FDRE constitution on mandate jurisdiction about her-
            mental states, liberal economies, and different types   itage matters between Federal and State Governments
            of markets and levels of economies. Third, there are   To evaluate the Constitutional Permissibility of
            no such grounded empirical pieces of evidence else-  FDRE Proclamation No. 209/2000
            where; to the researcher’s knowledge, they are not   To evaluate the validity of  FDRE Heritage Proc-
            vindicated and verified empirically, especially in Ethi-  lamation  No.  209/2000  against  international  decla-
            opia; this again demands corroboration and substan-  rations on the right of indigenous peoples regarding
            tiation type of research in Ethiopia. Five, there are no   heritage self-determination
            agreed and exhaustive pieces of literature in this re-  To articulate the potential adverse effects of FDRE
            gard, and no antitheses sufficiently provided. This pa-  Heritage Proclamation No. 209/2000 in the Ethiopian
            per sees these problems as an apparent scientific rift.   Tourism remuneration landscape
            A semi-exploratory type of discourse should warrant
            initial investigation to fill the need to establish a new   Literature Review 
            theory adequately.                            Literature-Map on the Discourse of Enquiry 
               Probing along these lines of dialects at the phe-  Literature mapping discourse of this study has re-
            nomenal levels, apart from the above academic aspects   vealed that there are many areas of research in Her-
            of the necessities, and with regards to Ethiopian con-  itage and Tourism related politics: one aspect of lit-
            text leads that the issue requires clear articulation of   erature is heritage laws, governance, and tourism
            the Constitution of the FDRE on account of its essence   (Wight & Lennon, 2007; Darian-Smith, 2013; Anker,
            and substantive spirit on mandate jurisdiction about   2014; Soderland & Lilley, 2015; McCamley & Gilmore,
            heritage governance and ownership matters between   2017; Berman, 2012; Carpenter & Riley, 2014; Klabbers
            Federal and State Governments. Second, it requires   & Piiparinen, 2013; Al-Ansi et al., 2021). The second
            evaluating the FDRE Proclamation No. 209/2000 on   significant stream is public policy and tourism politics
            account of Constitutional permissibility. Third, there   (Kerr et al., 2001; Hall & Rusher, 2004; Krutwaysho
            is a  need  to validate the  FDRE Heritage Proclama-  & Bramwell, 2010). Another stream of study is the
            tion No. 209/2000 against international declarations   heritage economics and political economy of tour-
            on the right of indigenous peoples regarding herit-  ism (Bramwell, 2011; Nelson, 2012; Nunkoo & Smith,
            age self-determination; fourth, it requires analytical   2013).
            articulation on the potential adverse effects of FDRE
            Heritage  Proclamation  No.  209/2000  in  Ethiopian   Literature Review on Heritage Laws, Governance
            Tourism on account of its remuneration landscape   and Politics
            and overall industrial vigorousness. These all together   Merryman (1986) articulates two competing dimen-
            necessitated the applied aspect of the current research   sions of the ownership ladder of cultural property:
            discourse. Hence, the discourse features at both the   one as the common culture of all humanity embod-
            conceptual and the unprecedented levels, as indicated   ied in the 1954 Hague Convention and the other as
            in the above two paragraphs.                  belonging to certain nations represented in the 1970
                                                          UNESCO Convention. However, there is a third way
            Objectives of the Study                       to it (Lixinski, 2019), where the host community is
            This  research aims  to  analyse  the  permissibility  of   brought upfront or at least to the centre from the back
            the federal legal frameworks established generally on   seat (Lixinski, 2019; Al-Ansi et al., 2021) in the dichot-



                                               Proceedings of the 7th UNESCO UNITWIN Conference | 19
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28