Page 26 - International Perspectives on Effective Teaching and Learning in Digital Education
P. 26

Maša Černelič-Bizjak and Sabina Ličen

                       Stone, L. (7, 3 November). Beyond simple multi-tasking: Continuous partial
                           attention. https://lindastone.net/9/11/3/beyond-simple-multi-tasking
                           -continuous-partial-atte
                       Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (19). Cognitive architecture and
                           instructional design:  years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(),
                           61–9.
                       Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and
                           instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 51–96.
                       Theobald, M. (1). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance univer-
                           sity students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies,
                           and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
                           66, 11976.
                       Vaccaro, A. G., & Fleming, S. M. (18). Thinking about thinking: A coordi-
                           nate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive
                           judgements. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2. https://doi.org/1.1177
                           /398181881591
                       Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (4). Education reform and change
                           driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspec-
                           tive. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 56.
                       Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (). Expectancy-value theory of achievement
                           motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
                       Yilmaz, R., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Keser, H. (). Vertical versus shared
                           e-leadership approach in online project-based learning: A comparison
                           of self-regulated learning skills, motivation and group collaboration pro-
                           cesses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 68–654.
                       Yin, X., Zhang, J., Li, G., & Luo, H. (4). Understanding learner satisfaction in
                           virtual learning environments: Serial mediation effects of cognitive and
                           social-emotional factors. Electronics, 13(1), 77.
                       Zeitlhofer, I., Hörmann, S., Mann, B., Hallinger, K., & Zumbach, J. (3). Effects of
                           cognitive and metacognitive prompts on learning performance in digital
                           learning environments. Knowledge, 3(), 77–9.

                       Psihološki dejavniki in mehanizmi digitalnega učenja
                       Digitalno okolje se razlikuje od naravnega in družbenega okolja. Tehnologije se
                       razvijajo in podpirajo nove metode sodelovalnega učenja ter interakcij. Ključni
                       izziv je zagotoviti, da bo izobraževanje, podprto s tehnologijo, učinkovito in bo
                       ustvarjalo spodbudno okolje za učence. Pri tem je treba upoštevati motivacijo,
                       čustva in psihološke dejavnike, kot so notranja motivacija, kognitivna obre-
                       menitev in samoregulacija, ki vplivajo na vključenost in uspešnost učencev pri
                       digitalnem učenju.
                        To poglavje vsebuje pregled literature o psiholoških procesih, pomembnih
                       za digitalno učenje. Dejavniki, kot so motivacija, upravljanje kognitivnih pro-



                  6
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31