Page 115 - World Heritage and Tourism Innovation
P. 115

Anton Gosar                           Layers of Tourism in Protected Ecosystems of Slovenia




            Table 6  Interviewing Visitors to the Triglav National Park: Activity During TNP Visit
             Activity Performed*              Residents of TNP   % Other Slove-  %  Foreign   %  All  %
                                                Municipalities  nian Citizens    Visitors
             Mountaineering / Hiking                     59  47       160    48      85   47  304 48
             Mountain Biking / Biking                    50  39       133    41      71   40  254 40
             Other Recreation (motorised vehicles, ski   18  14        35    11      23   13   76 12
             touring, base jumping, etc.)
             N = 634                                    127 100       328   100     179   100  634 100
            Source  Renata Mavri (2020)


            itors whose mode of recreation is related to different   terests in the TNP - A base for the management of the
            types of bikes (40%) and recreation vehicles - four-  park (Mlekuž & Zupan, 2011) or in the Aspects of car-
            wheel recreation vehicles, motorbikes, and motorised   rying capacities and recreation management: the case
            slides (12%) - has exploded (Table 6).        of Triglav Nations Park, Slovenia (Mrak et al., 2018).
               Layers produced by tens of thousands of hikers
            yearly can be traced on or near designated paths (also   Conclusion
            by trash); generally, they do not conflict with the resi-  Protected areas are established to protect the inherit-
            dential population or park authority. Mountain bikers   ed natural and cultural biodiversity. At the same time,
            (increasingly using electric power) are also seldom   these areas provide essential goods and services for
            becoming a burden to the local population and park   the residential population and could be admired by
            management. The concern is particularly directed to   other humans visiting. Tourism has become essential
            the increasing number of leisure activities motorised   to the areas in and around national parks, landscape
            recreation  vehicles  perform.  Most  visitors,  foreign   parks and natural monuments. Management of tour-
            and domestic, are opting against events which would   ist visits to protected sites is often inadequate. Stand-
            take place in the park (78% and 76%), whereas, to a   ards of protection, set on the international level, have
            certain extent, surprisingly, a substantial number of   been implemented selectively – even worse, due to na-
            the local population would support such acts (39%).   tional promotion directives, protection of outstand-
               In general, all agree that the number of visitors in   ing heritage becomes a minor priority. The national
            the area where they hike, bike, or otherwise recreate   park  (TNP)  protection,  with  its  strict  regime  at  its
            must be limited: the local population opts for a max-  core, has no adequate regimes set on lower intensity
            imum of 500 visitors per day (31%), Slovenian and   protection levels in Slovenia. The number of visitors
            international visitors would rather see that number   to protected sites of nature (open spaces) is constant-
            between 50 and 200 (72% and 66%). All agree that the   ly growing, even in years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
            non-regulated system of visits is nowadays absolute.   Visits also increased by the presented and elaborated
            On the relationship between residents and visitors to   booklet of the Slovenian Tourist Bureau, in the pro-
            the Triglav National Park, the authors of this study   motional brochure “Slovenija na prostem. Moj način
            concluded: “Tourism development in protected sites   gibanja v naravi” (Open Air Slovenia. My Movements
            of nature has reached the level of saturation and needs   in Nature). Negative impacts humans impose on na-
            to be re-evaluated” (Mavri, 2020, p. 268). Suggestions   ture in protected sites - like motorised traffic, mass
            on how to limit or otherwise restrain visitors from vis-  events, noisy and other selected sports activities, etc.
            iting popular sites in this nation’s largest protected site   - distract from preserving the area’s intangible natu-
            of nature (and culture) are included in several previ-  ral values. The tourist industry and tourists as visitors
            ous studies financed and published by the TNP - such   to protected sites – national, regional and landscape
            as The Analyses of the Cohabitation and Clash of in-  parks - acknowledge that the international restric-



                                              Proceedings of the 7th UNESCO UNITWIN Conference | 111
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120