Page 472 - Vseživljenjsko učenje kot temelj trajnostne družbe
P. 472

Sanja Partalo, Nevena Vučen Papić, Dragana Malivuk Gak, and Dino Hasanagić


                  lection method as they allow for open-ended responses and promote a more
                  natural and dynamic exchange of ideas among participants. Unlike question-
                  naires or other more structured instruments, focus groups provide a flexi-
                  ble environment in which participants feel more comfortable elaborating on
                  their thoughts and engaging in deeper reflection. In addition to core ques-
                  tions, follow-up prompts were used within the focus groups to encourage
                  further exploration of participants’ views and experiences.

                  Participants
                  The study included five focus groups (labelled FG1 to FG5), comprising a total
                  of 25 participants (N = 25), all of whom were student teachers enrolled at the
                  University of Banja Luka. The sample was selected using purposive sampling,
                  with the intention of ensuring disciplinary diversity and relevance of partici-
                  pants’ studyprogrammes inrelationto the potential implementation of the
                  STEAM approach in future teaching practice.
                    Focus group sessions were conducted on university premises with partici-
                  pants’ informed consent. Each session lasted between 45 and 60 minutes and
                  was moderated using a Focus Group Protocol, which included pre-defined
                  thematic units: awareness of STEAM, perceived benefits and challenges, ap-
                  plicability in teaching, training during studies, and support needs.
                    The research intentionally focused exclusively on students enrolled in
                  teacher education programmes, rather than those following general aca-
                  demic tracks, as the aim was to explore perceptions of those who are being
                  directly prepared for future roles in education. Particular attention was given
                  to students from disciplines where the integration of STEAM principles is
                  both feasible and pedagogically relevant-such as science, technology, and
                  the arts-given their potential to apply transdisciplinary and innovative ap-
                  proaches in their future classrooms.

                  Data Analysis
                  Athematicanalysisofresponsesprovidedbyparticipantsinfivefocusgroups
                  was performed, focusing on their knowledge, attitudes, perceived chal-
                  lenges, and possibilities for implementing the STEAM approach in education.
                  The statements are organised according to key thematic categories and illus-
                  trated with representative quotations, accompanied by synthesised findings
                  for each area. The labels FG1–FG5 refer to the following focus groups: FG1 –
                  second-year students of the Pedagogy Study Programme, Faculty of Philos-
                  ophy; FG2 – fourth-year students of the Physics Study Programme, Faculty of
                  Natural Sciences and Mathematics; FG3 – third-year students of the Chem-


                  472
   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477