Page 128 - Petelin Ana. Ur. 2022. Zdravje otrok in mladostnikov / Health of children and adolescents. Proceedings. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem/University of Primorska Press
P. 128
avje otrok in mladostnikov | health of children and adolescents 128 nificantly increased in the intervention (44.2%, p = 0.037) and control group
(37.8%, p = 0.001). We observe a trend towards slightly greater improvement in
the intervention group.
Figure 5: Graphic representation of the box with whiskers for the values
of the variable TTCO₂ (s)
For the other variables measured (FVC, FEV1, PEF, IV, counting time af-
ter maximum inspiration) there is no statistically significant effect of time or
time and group.
The result of the 50-100m swimming time test show statistically signifi-
cant differences in the effect of time (F (1,14) = 4.600; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.895) with
a large effect size (Figure 6). The result of the test increased significantly in the
intervention group by 30,7% (p = 0.000) and in the control group by 40,1% (p
= 0.001). The trend of a smaller decrease in swimming time in the intervention
group is shown.
Figure 6: Graphic representation of the box with whiskers for the values
of the variable swim time 50–100 m (s)
The results of the 0-100m swimming time test also show statistically sig-
nificant differences in the effect of time (F (1,14) = 4.600; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.830)
with a large effect size (Figure 7). The result increased statistically significant-
(37.8%, p = 0.001). We observe a trend towards slightly greater improvement in
the intervention group.
Figure 5: Graphic representation of the box with whiskers for the values
of the variable TTCO₂ (s)
For the other variables measured (FVC, FEV1, PEF, IV, counting time af-
ter maximum inspiration) there is no statistically significant effect of time or
time and group.
The result of the 50-100m swimming time test show statistically signifi-
cant differences in the effect of time (F (1,14) = 4.600; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.895) with
a large effect size (Figure 6). The result of the test increased significantly in the
intervention group by 30,7% (p = 0.000) and in the control group by 40,1% (p
= 0.001). The trend of a smaller decrease in swimming time in the intervention
group is shown.
Figure 6: Graphic representation of the box with whiskers for the values
of the variable swim time 50–100 m (s)
The results of the 0-100m swimming time test also show statistically sig-
nificant differences in the effect of time (F (1,14) = 4.600; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.830)
with a large effect size (Figure 7). The result increased statistically significant-
